| These aquaculture-
                    and conservation-oriented
                    commentaries are not abstracts written by the original authors. 
                    They reflect the opinions of someone else -- usually Roger Doyle.  Direct quotations from the papers or
                    abstracts are marked with inverted commas.
                   453. 
                      The first shrimp anti-viral gene and proteinPmAV,
                      a novel gene involved in virus resistance of shrimp Penaeus monodon. 2003. Luo, T., X. Zhang, Z. Shao and X. Xu. FEBS
                    Letters 551:53-57.
 Very often when a farmed
                    shrimp population is commercially wiped out by WSSV, a few of the animals
                    survive. One would like to use them in a breed-the-survivors broodstock
                    improvement program but this can rarely be done, because the survivors are
                    assumed to be both infected and infective. The alternative approach to
                    capturing the genetic superiority of survivors -- if indeed they are
                    genetically superior -- is to breed their relatives. This approach,
                    usually in the form of between-family selection, often turns out to be either impossible
                    or ineffectual in practice. However, if resistance genes can be identified
                    one could select the individuals which carry them without exposing animals to the disease. Thus the search for disease resistance genes,
                    or markers closely linked to such genes, is an important goal for
                    aquaculture genetics. The relative inefficiency of marker assisted
                    selection (MAS)  noted in May
                    2003 #399 is not relevant if there is no practical alternative.
 The authors of this paper
                    examined a survivor from a WSSV infected farm pond in China and, by using
                    a differential cDNA procedure, identified a gene which produces a lectin-like
                    anti-microbial polypeptide. (See Jul 2000 #81 and Jan 2002 #282 for other
                    differential cDNA experiments, and see May 2000 #55, May 2002 #319 and Oct
                    2002 #349 for more about anti-microbial polypeptides.) The cDNA resembles
                    a lectin but apparently has no close affinity with anything previously
                    reported. The gene fragment was cloned and expressed as a recombinant
                    protein in E. coli.
 "[The recombinant protein] displayed a strong antiviral activity in
                    inhibiting virus-induced cytopathic effect in fish cell in vitro.
                    Moreover, a native PmAV protein was isolated from shrimp hemolymph by
                    immuno-affinity chromatography and confirmed by Western blot." The
                    native protein was in the hemolymph, not attached to the WSSV, and neither
                    it nor the recombinant protein caused agglutination. From this the authors
                    infer that however it works, the molecule is not a recognition factor and
                    does not inhibit attachment of the virus to the cell membrane (or at least
                    doesn't do so directly). xxu@public.xm.fj.cn
 452. 
                    Why YY tilapia supermales don't produce 100% male offspringSex ratios in the progeny of
                    androgenetic and gynogenetic YY male Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
                    L. 2004. Ezaz, M. T., J. M. Myers, S. F. Powell, B. J. McAndrew and D. J.
                    Penman. Aquaculture 232:205-214.
 This new paper from the
                    Stirling group adds considerably to our understanding of the "YY
                    Supermale" procedure for producing all-male tilapia (Oct 2003 #435,
                    Mar 2003 #393, Jun 2002 #332). It is no secret that commercial YY breeding
                    programs do not, in
                    fact, produce solely male tilapia, although the sex ratio is strongly
                    biased in that direction. The public-perception risk associated with
                    hormonal sex reversal makes it worthwhile to find out why YY supermale
                    technology doesn't work perfectly, and then fix it.
 Temperature modifies the
                    sex ratio (Jan 2002 #282) and it is strongly suspected that there are sex
                    modifying genes in the genetic background, outside the XX-XY sex
                    determination system (Oct 2003 #435). The experiments reported here
                    comprise progeny tests on offspring of YY males produced by androgenesis
                    and by mitotic gynogenesis. "The factor(s) that cause departures from
                    the sex ratios predicted by chromosomal sex determination appear to be
                    autosomal, heritable, polymorphic and able to influence sex ratios in both
                    directions [too many
                    females or too many males] . Furthermore, the results suggest that YY and XX lines
                    could be developed in which such factors had been selected against, for
                    example, by elimination of families showing departures from monosex
                    progeny." d.j.penman@stir.ac.uk
 451.  AFLP markers better than microsatellites 2003. Campbell, D., P. Duchesne and L. Bernatchez. Molecular Ecology
                    12:1979-1991.This case study (on
                    whitefish) "showed that given a comparable analytical effort in the
                    laboratory, AFLP were much more efficient than the microsatellite loci in
                    discriminating the source of an individual among putative populations.
                    AFLP resulted in higher assignment success at all levels of stringency and
                    the log-likelihood differences between populations obtained with AFLP for
                    each individual were much larger than those obtained with microsatellites.
                    These results indicate that research involving individual-based population
                    assignment methods should benefit importantly from the use of AFLP
                    markers, especially in systems characterized by weak population
                    structuring." See Aug 2003 #417. The point is, AFLPs are easier than
                    microsatellites to find and score in large numbers, and they are more
                    reliable than the earlier RAPD markers. The AFLP statistical analyses were
                    carried out with AFLPOP, Duchesne & Bernatchez's Excel program
                    available free at http://www.bio.ulaval.ca/contenu-fra/professeurs/Prof-l-bernatchez.html .  Microsatellite analyses were
                    done with Cornuet's GENECLASS. Louis.Bernatchez@bio.ulaval.ca .
 450. 
                    Zeroing in on tilapia MHC2003. Cnaani, A., B.-Y. Lee, M. Ron, G. Hulata,
                    T. D. Kocher and E. Seroussi. Animal Genetics 34:390-391.Two loci in the Type I
                    MHC were found to be closely linked to each other, on linkage group 18,
                    close to a couple of published microsatellite markers. This could be
                    useful information for marker assisted selection and other studies on
                    disease resistance in this species. The most recent tilapia linkage map
                    can be found at http://hcgs.unh.edu.comp . The major histocompatibility
                    locus is currently a major focus of fish genetics research. See Mar 2003
                    #398, Oct 2003 #434 and other citations mentioned therein. seroussi@agri.huji.ac.il .
 449. 
                    Evaluation of computer programs for estimating genetic relatednessMaximum-likelihood estimation of
                    relatedness. 2003.
                    Milligan, B. G. Genetics 163:1153-1167.
 The
                    effectiveness of all the current genetic relatedness estimators is
                    reviewed here. Microsatellite-based estimators are potentially useful
                    substitutes for pedigree records during the founding of
                    conservation and aquacultural populations (Jan 2002 #283, Mar 2002 #303,
                    Jan 2003 #375, Aug 2003 #425 and #448 below). The maximum-likelihood (ML)
                    estimator of Thompson (1975; Ann. Hum. Genet. 39: 173–188) was used as a
                    benchmark. Other relatedness estimators include Ritland (Dec 2000 #142),
                    Wang (May 2002 #320), Lynch & Ritland, Queller & Goodnight etc.
 The Thompson ML turns out
                    to have a lower standard error but to be more biased. However, steps can
                    be taken to remove the bias which in any case is not large. "Although
                    some nonlikelihood estimators exhibit better performance with respect to
                    specific metrics under some conditions, none approach the high level of
                    performance exhibited by the likelihood estimator across all conditions
                    and all metrics of performance." The author does not mention whether
                    he will give out the C++ program he wrote to calculate the Thompson ML
                    estimator. See Sept. 2001 #227 for another review of relatedness estimators. brook@nmsu.edu
 448.  Microsatellite relatedness estimator used for minimal kinship selection Paralichthys olivaceus. 2004.
                    Sekino, M., T. Sugaya, M. Hara and N. Taniguchi. Aquaculture 233:163-172.Minimal kinship breeding
                    can help conserve genetic diversity in small populations (Nov 2001
                    #261, Aug 2002 #335). In MK breeding one identifies and selects breeders
                    that are least related (in the genealogical sense) to the population as a
                    whole, and thus most likely to be carrying unique genes. The MK procedure
                    has become popular for managing rare animal populations in zoos, where
                    loss of genetic diversity is often an acute problem. It was shown several
                    years ago (Jan 2002 #283) that microsatellite relatedness estimators could
                    also be used for MK breeding in aquaculture and genetic conservation when
                    accurate pedigrees are not available.
 The authors of this paper
                    apply the procedure to a population of Japanese flounder. It worked
                    reasonably well, although apparently not as well as in (Jan 2002 #283),
                    perhaps because the hard-to-program Ritland estimator and/or maximum
                    likelihood estimators of genetic relatedness (see #449 above) were not
                    used. sekino@affrc.go.jp
 447. 
                    Diversity is lost when a hatchery is foundedLoss of genetic variation at
                    microsatellite loci in hatchery produced abalone in Australia (Haliotis
                    rubra) and South Africa (Haliotis midae). 2004. Evans, B., J. Bartlett, N. Sweijd, P. Cook and N. G. Elliott.
                    Aquaculture 233:109-127.
 The first hatchery
                    generations of abalone were missing an estimated 35% - 62% of the
                    microsatellite alleles present in the wild populations from which they
                    were founded. However, this
                    substantial loss of genetic diversity during the founding of the
                    population did not noticeably decrease overall heterozygosity.
                    Allele diversity is known to be the best indicator of the genetic
                    consequences of small population size and biased sampling of founders. The
                    diversity lost here was comparable to or even greater than that reported in May
                    2003 #406 during the founding of an Atlantic halibut hatchery broodstock. nick.elliott@csiro.au
 446. 
                    Evaluation of computer programs for family identificationMethods of parentage analysis in
                    natural populations. 2003.
                    Jones, A. G. and W. R. Ardren. Molecular Ecology 12:2511-2523.
 This is a useful
                    comparative evaluation of the current crop of  programs for identifying parent-offspring groups on the basis of
                    microsatellite and other genetic markers. The authors say, "Our goal
                    is to provide a comprehensive guide to the existing methods of analysis,
                    with a particular emphasis on those techniques that have been implemented
                    into readily available computer software packages. Our intent is to direct
                    scientists interested in parentage analysis to the correct set of
                    analytical tools for their particular problems." And that is what the
                    authors do. adam.jones@biology.gatech.edu
 445. 
                    Inbreeding depression is more serious under natural conditionsCaptivity masks inbreeding
                    effects on male mating success in butterflies. 2003. Joron, M. and P. M.
                    Brakefield. Nature 424:191-194.
 Populations of
                    butterflies were inbred to three levels,  F = 0, F = 0.25 and F = 0.375. In laboratory cages inbred males had
                    somewhat lower mating success than outbred males. Although small the
                    effect was statistically significant, i.e. not mere bad luck. In a
                    nearly-natural greenhouse environment inbreeding depression was much
                    larger, a depression of approximately 50% for males inbred to F=0.375. The authors say
                    that "Our results have important implications for conservation and
                    for studies of sexual selection because they show that the behaviours
                    underlying patterns of mating can be profoundly influenced by a history of
                    inbreeding or by any restraining experimental conditions".
 It is not clear whether
                    the captive environment represented by aquaculture (including fish
                    stocking programs) should be considered more or less
                    "constraining" than the natural environment, but my guess is that it is more constraining. Constraints on mating behaviour in
                    captivity may have negative genetic consequences other than through
                    inbreeding, e.g. by interfering with MHC-based choice of mates (Aug 2001
                    #221).  See Aug 2003 #422 for
                    another study of inbreeding depression in the wild, Jun 2000 #71 for the
                    effect of inbreeding on shrimp, and Apr 2001 #185, May 2001 #193 and Oct
                    2002 #347 for other inbreeding experiments on this species of butterfly.
                    See #442 below for inbreeding effects on salmon behaviour. m.joron@ucl.ac.uk
 444. 
                    Beauty is heritable, in troutBig and beautiful? Quantitative
                    genetic parameters for appearance of large rainbow trout. 2003. Kause, A., O. Ritola, T. Paananen, U.
                    Eskelinen and E. Mäntysaari. Journal of Fish Biology 62:610-622.
 Body condition, body
                    shape, skin colour and spottiness of  Oncorhynchus
                    mykiss showed reasonably high heritabilities (0.3 - 0.5) in this Finnish
                    study, which bodes well for aquacultural breeders interested in selecting
                    for these traits. Furthermore, the correlation between body weight and
                    condition factor was positive, i.e. no troubling tradeoffs to worry about.
                    Traits which required subjective evaluation, such as colour,
                    were scored on a categorical scale by trained observers, then converted to
                    an underlying continuous scale for genetic analysis. Apparently this
                    worked: "A fast method was developed to visually evaluate the
                    appearance of thousands of individuals, even under harsh field
                    conditions." antti.kause@mtt.fi
 443. 
                    Lower diversity means lower fitness, in generalCorrelation between fitness and
                    genetic diversity. 2003. Reed, D. H. and R. Frankham. Conservation Biology 17:230-237.
 This paper reports the
                    results of a meta-analysis of 34 published studies in which there were
                    simultaneous estimates of fitness (or a component thereof), population
                    size and two important measures of genetic variability: heritability of
                    quantitative traits and/or heterozygosity at neutral marker loci.  "The mean weighted correlation between [both] measures
                    of genetic diversity, at the population level, and population fitness was
                    0.4323. The correlation was highly significant and explained 19% of the
                    variation in fitness. "Our study strengthens concerns that the loss
                    of heterozygosity has a deleterious effect on population fitness and
                    supports the IUCN designation of genetic diversity as worthy of
                    conservation." dreed@rna.bio.mq.edu.au
 442. 
                    Lower genetic diversity means lower aggressionAggressiveness is associated
                    with genetic diversity in landlocked salmon (Salmo salar). 2003. Tiira, K., A. Laurila, N. Peuhkuri, J.
                    Piironen, E. Ranta and C. R. Primmer. Molecular Ecology 12:2399-2407.
 It is not unreasonable to
                    expect that fitness and aggression are positively correlated in natural
                    populations of salmon. The authors of this paper predicted the genetic
                    diversity of offspring from microsatellite data collected on the parents. Fry which
                    were predicted to have high genetic diversity (by several measures) were
                    more aggressive than those predicted to have low diversity. "Salmon
                    fry with low estimated genetic diversity were significantly less
                    aggressive than fry with high estimated genetic diversity. Closer analysis
                    of the data suggested that this difference was due to differences in more
                    costly acts of aggression." The mating design used in this experiment
                    resulted in the fry having low genetic diversity and low aggression also
                    being significantly more inbred than animals with high diversity &
                    aggression. Thus, as is so often the case, the question whether
                    the results are caused by inbreeding depression or some other consequence
                    of low genetic diversity, or even by kin-recognition, remains to some
                    degree open. See #445 above for inbreeding effects on male butterfly behaviour. craig.primmer@helsinki.fi
 441.  A long-term perspective on
                    genetic managementParallel changes in gene
                    expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. 2003. Cooper, T. F., D. E. Rozen and R. E.
                    Lenski. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences (US) 100:1072-1077.
 It has become possible to
                    observe the expression of many genes simultaneously and watch them switch
                    on and off during normal development of an organism, or while it attempts to
                    cope with pathogens or changing environments. Knowledge of the
                    pattern and sequence of gene expression will increase our basic
                    understanding of adaptation to life's contingencies and, we hope, will
                    also eventually assist in the selective improvement of broodstocks
                    (aquaculture) and identification of evolutionarily significant populations
                    (conservation). Experiments on gene expression already noted here are Sep 2001
                    #233, May 2002 #319 and Jan 2003 #377. There will be a lot more of this
                    kind of work.
 The above-cited studies,
                    on aquacultural species, involved direct sequencing of cDNA one clone at a
                    time. This
                    is a time consuming procedure.  Much
                    faster analysis of gene expression is possible for a humans and a few
                    model organisms with a procedure known variously as genome chip, biochip,
                    DNA chip, DNA microarray, or gene array. (Note that since GeneChip® is a registered trademark genechip shouldn't be used as a generic
                    term, at least within earshot of Affymetrix Inc.)  In
                    principle it's simple: probes for the coding regions of thousands of
                    genes are attached to a solid substrate in a rectangular array. When
                    labeled cDNA or cRNA from a target organism is flooded over the array it
                    hybridizes to some of the probes. The amount of label at each site in the
                    array is measured, and from this measurement it is possible to estimate
                    the activity of the genes which were switched on and working in the
                    target, even genes with unknown biological functions. Construction of a
                    DNA microarray is a complex industrial process and the equipment for doing
                    it is not available off-the-shelf. DNA microarrays are sold commercially,
                    not the equipment for making them.
 The authors of this paper
                    allowed populations of the bacterium E. coli to evolve for 20,000
                    generations in a glucose-limited medium, and then used a DNA microarray
                    carrying probes for every gene in the E. coli genome. Let us think of this as
                    a long-term experiment in conservation genetics. (If a comparable experiment were to
                    be done on Atlantic salmon, 20,000 generations would carry it most of the
                    way through the coming ice age, by which time salmon DNA microarrays
                    should be available for purchase.)
 The intrinsic rate of
                    population increase, r was higher in both evolved bacterial clones, showing that
                    adaptive evolution to this classic evolutionary challenge did occur. The
                    expression patterns of 59 genes changed relative to the ancestral
                    population -- the same 59 genes in both clones, even though the
                    clones evolved in isolation from each other. This seems amazing. Could the
                    evolution of isolated populations really be so consistent and predictable?
 Well, yes and no. It
                    turns out that the expression of many of the 59 genes is controlled by a
                    small set of regulatory genes. A mutation in one of the regulatory genes
                    was identified which caused most of the changes in expression in one
                    population. When transferred into the  ancestral population the mutation
                    changed the expression pattern of the whole regulon, as predicted, and
                    also increased r, as predicted. But when the mutation was transferred
                    into the  other evolved population it did not have these effects. In the
                    second population, a different, still unidentified, regulatory mutation
                    caused the 59 changes in expression.
 So different populations, following different evolutionary paths,
                    converged on the same
                    functional solution to their environmental problem. Furthermore, after one possible solution to
                    the evolutionary
                    challenge was found, the alternative solution was blocked or pre-empted.
                    If the transgenic "evolved hybrid" is actually less fit than its
                    evolved host -- something the authors do not mention -- we have observed
                    the evolution of outbreeding depression. cooperti@msu.edu
 |